Waypoint TelemetryWaypoint Telemetry

Case Study · Minnesota Department of Transportation · Edina, Minnesota

Side by side with an infrared counter, and seeing what it can’t.

MnDOT lends people counters to Minnesota cities that don’t have their own. On the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail bridge over Highway 100, we ran Waypoint’s AI trail cameras next to one of those infrared counters to answer two questions: do the counts agree, and what more can a camera tell a transportation agency?

Headline result

7–12%

difference in daily totals from the infrared counter on the two full test days, with activity, helmets and direction on top.

Partner
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT)
Site
Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail bridge over Highway 100, Edina
Compared with
Eco-Counter PYRO-Box infrared counter
Data shown
Apr 7 – 13, 2026 (7 days)
Sensors
3 solar cellular cameras
Volume
1,828 passages counted

01 · The challenge

A total count is where most trail data stops

Since 2013, MnDOT’s Pedestrian and Bicyclist Data Program has built a network of permanent counters and portable counters that can be borrowed, to inform state, regional and local planning.[6] Through its counter loaner program, cities and organizations without their own equipment can measure a trail or a street.

An infrared counter does one thing well: it counts bodies passing a beam. It can’t say whether they were walking, riding or pushing a stroller, whether a cyclist wore a helmet, or whether a motorbike was on a path built for people. Waypoint approached MnDOT to find out whether a vision-based counter could match the infrared count and add that context.

02 · Background

The only crossing of Highway 100 for about a mile

The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is a 15.3-mile paved trail through Hopkins, Minnetonka, Edina and Richfield, run by Three Rivers Park District.[2] In Edina it crosses state highways on two long concrete girder pedestrian bridges, 588 and 1,025 feet long.[4][1] The Highway 100 bridge is the only way to cross the highway on foot or by bike within about a square mile, so every trip across it passes one point: an ideal spot to compare counters.

  1. 2000 – 2014

    The first 9.2 miles were built through Hopkins, Minnetonka, Richfield and Bloomington, leaving a gap through Edina.[4]

  2. 2013

    MnDOT started the Minnesota Pedestrian and Bicyclist Data Program.[6]

  3. 2014

    Three Rivers applied for federal funds for the west Edina segment and projected more than 500,000 visitors a year for the whole trail.[5]

  4. June 3, 2018

    The completed trail opened. The Edina segment took nearly four years and $25 million, with two highway bridges and 1.7 miles of timber boardwalk.[3][4] MnDOT, the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County and four cities were partners.[3]

  5. April 2026

    Waypoint and MnDOT ran AI trail cameras beside a loaned infrared counter on the Highway 100 bridge.

03 · The approach

One infrared counter, three cameras

MnDOT staff and Waypoint installed the equipment together in early April. An Eco-Counter PYRO-Box infrared counter from MnDOT’s loaner fleet went at the west entrance to the bridge, and three solar cellular cameras went around it:

  • Site 1, the west entrance, beside the infrared counter. Trees and poles were scarce, so the camera looked through the bridge fence with highway traffic behind it.
  • Site 2, on the bridge, about 200 feet along with no exits in between, added as the reliable reference.
  • Site 3, the Hibiscus entrance, in a tree over a feeder path from the neighborhood east of Highway 100.

Nothing was drilled, wired or trenched. Every passage is classified by activity and direction of travel, cyclists are checked for helmets, faces are blurred automatically, and each count links to the photo behind it.

Waypoint camera and solar panel on a sign post on the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail bridge in Edina (Site 2)
MnDOT staff member in a safety vest on the trail bridge during installation
Waypoint camera mounted high in a tree beside the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail beside the pedestrian bridge, with installation gear on the grass

04 · Against the IR counter

Hour by hour, the camera tracked the infrared counter closely

Comparing the bridge camera (Site 2) with the infrared counter hour by hour showed strong correlation: the same morning rise, the same afternoon peaks, the same quiet nights. On the two full test days the infrared counter’s totals were 12% and 6.8% higher than the camera’s.

Which one is closer to the truth is still open. Infrared counters are known to both overcount and undercount, and spring weather cut the planned manual counts short, so there was no full manual count to settle it. In a 90-minute manual check, the bridge camera made no errors.

Line chart of hourly counts on the Nine Mile Creek Highway 100 bridge from the Waypoint camera and the Eco-Counter PYRO-Box, April 7 to 10, 2026, rising and falling together each day
Hourly counts, bridge camera vs. infrared counter, Apr 7 – 10, 2026.
Bar chart of daily totals from the Waypoint camera and the Eco-Counter PYRO-Box, April 7 to 10, 2026, with the infrared counter slightly higher on April 8 and 9
Daily totals. April 8 and 9 were the full test days; April 7 and 10 were partial.

Two cameras 200 feet apart showed how much placement matters

Sites 1 and 2 are on the same stretch of trail with no exits between them, so they should count the same people. They didn’t: Site 1 missed about 47% of the detections Site 2 made over three days.

The cause was the site, not the model. Site 1 looked through the bridge fence, which hid people and confused motion detection, and passing highway traffic kept triggering the camera. Each trigger starts a 10-second cool-down, and people who passed during it were missed. The people it did capture were classified correctly, with the right direction. See how detection holds up in hard conditions.

Line chart of hourly counts at Waypoint Site 1 and Site 2 on the Nine Mile Creek bridge, with Site 1 consistently lower
Hourly counts at the bridge camera (Site 2) and the entrance camera (Site 1).
Site 1 camera view through the bridge fence: a jogger detected as a person with 0.86 confidence heading east toward the bridge
Site 1: a jogger correctly detected heading east, seen through the fence.
Site 2 camera view of the Nine Mile Creek bridge deck: a fast-moving cyclist detected as a person with a bike, heading west
Site 2: a fast cyclist detected as a person with a bike, heading west, with a clear view.

05 · What the counter can’t see

Who uses the bridge, and who doesn’t

Over the week the three cameras counted 1,828 passages. Of the people, 87% were on foot and most of the rest rode bikes. Among pedestrians, 92% were walking, 8% walking a dog and about 1% running, and 34% of people came in a group. The busiest day was a mild, cloudy Wednesday, April 8, and the busiest weekend day was a warm, stormy Sunday, April 12.

The “vehicle and other” share is mostly cars, trucks and buses on Highway 100, seen through the bridge railing. An exclusion drawn over the highway lanes keeps that traffic out of the trail counts.

Passages by type, all three sites1,828 passages, Apr 7 – 13, 2026.
Pedestrian
72%
1,316
Bicyclist
10%
184
Vehicle & other
18%
328

81%

of cyclists wore a helmet, of 93 where it could be seen

87%

of people were on foot

34%

of people were in a group

55 / 45

split in direction of travel, of 797 people with a clear heading

Waypoint dashboard chart of passages in two-hour blocks, April 7 to 13, 2026, by pedestrian, bicyclist, skier and vehicle, with weather for each day; the busiest block reaches about 120 on April 8
Passages in two-hour blocks with daily weather, all sites, in the Waypoint dashboard.

Dog walkers turn back before the bridge

We noticed it on site first: plenty of dogs on the Hibiscus entrance path, few on the bridge. The data confirmed it. Of 98 dog walkers counted, 80 were at the Hibiscus entrance and only 18 on the bridge.

People walking dogs use the trail near home and mostly don’t cross the highway. An infrared counter on the bridge would never show that. The same counts show how much traffic this low-profile entrance carries as a gateway for the Edina neighborhood east of Highway 100.

Dog walkers counted by siteApr 7 – 13, 2026.
  • Hibiscus entrance80
  • Bridge, east end10
  • Bridge, west end8
Hibiscus entrance camera view: a person walking a dog in a yellow coat, counted as a dog walker, with the face blurred
Hibiscus entrance, Apr 10, 7:21 a.m.: a dog walker, counted once, face blurred.

Motorbikes on a non-motorized bridge

The trail is for people walking and riding bikes, but the cameras recorded e-bikes and larger motorized bikes crossing the bridge, including eight motorcycle passages at its east end on April 8 alone, some of them at dusk. Each one comes with a photo, so the agencies responsible can see exactly what is using the bridge and decide what to do about it.

Bridge camera view at dusk: a rider on a motorized dirt bike with its headlight on, crossing the pedestrian bridge
Apr 8, 8:03 p.m.: a motorized dirt bike crossing the pedestrian bridge.
Bridge camera view: a rider on a heavy fat-tire electric bike with panniers, classified as motorized, crossing the pedestrian bridge
Apr 10, 1:04 p.m.: a heavy fat-tire e-bike, classified as motorized.

Strollers, wagons and kids

The same photos separate people pushing strollers and wagons from other walkers, and pair a person with the dog or bike they came with, so one family counts as one passage rather than a jumble of objects. That is the detail that tells a planner who a trail serves.

Hibiscus entrance camera view: a person pulling a child in a wagon with a golden retriever alongside, counted as one stroller user with the dog and wagon; faces blurred
Apr 8, 11:28 a.m.: a stroller user, with the dog and wagon counted as part of the same passage.
Waypoint dashboard charts for the Nine Mile Creek pilot: trail user mix, walking vs running, direction of travel, pedestrian grouping, helmet compliance at 81%, and vehicles by type
The pilot’s summary in the Waypoint dashboard. Every slice opens the photos behind it.

06 · What came next

A tool for studies the loaner counters can’t do

Comparable totals

Within 7–12% of an infrared counter on full days at a well-placed site, with a photo behind every count.

Context with the count

Mode, helmets, dogs, groups, direction and prohibited motorized use, all from the same images.

Nothing to build

Solar cellular cameras on trees and an existing post: no power, trenching or changes to the structure.

After the pilot, Waypoint and MnDOT kept working together on projects for Minnesota municipalities that need more than in-house counters can provide. The next step for the technology is a full three-way validation: cameras, infrared counters and manual counts at the same site.

07 · Lessons learned

What we learned

  1. 01

    Placement is half the accuracy.

    Two cameras 200 feet apart differed by 47% because one looked through a fence at highway traffic. Find a clear, angled view of the trail first.

  2. 02

    Keep the road out of the trigger.

    Every passing car started a 10-second cool-down. Aim cameras away from traffic, and use exclusions to keep it out of the counts.

  3. 03

    Plan manual counts with days to spare.

    Without a full manual count, a 7–12% gap between two counters can’t be assigned to either one.

  4. 04

    The context is the finding.

    Dog walkers avoiding the bridge and motorbikes using it were the most useful results, and neither shows up in a total.

Thanks to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for supporting this study through its counter loaner program.

08 · Sources

Sources

  1. Wikipedia, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
  2. Three Rivers Park District, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
  3. Three Rivers Park District, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail grand opening is June 3 (May 2018)
  4. SEH, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (project portfolio)
  5. Metropolitan Council, 2014 Regional Solicitation application: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, West Segment
  6. MnDOT, Minnesota Pedestrian and Bicyclist Data Program

Pilot counts come from the Waypoint Analytics platform for the MnDOT Nine Mile Creek pilot, Apr 7 – 13, 2026, and the infrared comparison from Waypoint’s pilot report to MnDOT (April 15, 2026). Engineering notes are in the original deployment write-up.

Counting a shared-use path or crossing?

See how shared-use path counts and transportation studies work, and how trail counts are validated.

All case studies

Ready to understand how your spaces are being used?

Tell us what you’re trying to measure. We’ll help you determine the right deployment.

Not sure how many sensors you need? Tell us about your trails, courts, parks, or study area and we’ll recommend a deployment.